Correct answers being marked as incorrect
Welcome to QSM Support Forum. › Forums › QSM Pro Support › Correct answers being marked as incorrect
Tagged: Beta Server
- This topic has 13 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 2 days, 22 hours ago by
Ert Narter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2020 at 3:22 pm #4031
[email protected]ParticipantHello, we’ve found a bug where even if the user answers a question correctly, it is still shown as incorrect in the results. This doesn’t happen for all questions, but I’ve tried deleting the question and making it again, and the error still happens. See attached screenshots for the backend and front-end results. We’re using the css class
qmn_question_answer_incorrectto style the results as incorrect.This may be related to another issue we have, where sometimes saved changes to the quizzes don’t ‘stick’; they sometimes revert back and the work has to be done again. We have some really long quizzes, is it possible there’s an internal limit to the number of quizzes/questions/pages there can be? If not, what else could be causing these issues?
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.May 19, 2020 at 3:23 pm #4034
[email protected]ParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.May 19, 2020 at 5:51 pm #4037
[email protected]ParticipantUpdate: We’ve isolated one of the questions having this issue in a separate quiz titled ‘Test Quiz’
May 19, 2020 at 6:15 pm #4038
[email protected]ParticipantAnother update: I think invisible characters may be causing the answers to be marked as incorrect. When I rewrite the answers all by hand, they’re marked as correct properly. I’m going to rewrite all the questions where this occurred, but I’ll leave the test quiz up in case you want to see for yourselves. Maybe there’s a way to sanitize for invisible characters
May 21, 2020 at 4:03 am #4075
Kriti SharmaKeymasterHi Ankit,
I tried to login with the credentials you provided, but wasn’t able to do so. Please provide the same so that I can check.
Regards,
KritiMay 21, 2020 at 1:27 pm #4096
[email protected]ParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.May 22, 2020 at 3:24 pm #4162
Kriti SharmaKeymasterHi Ankit,
I have forwarded your issue to the development team. But please expect a little delay in resolution as it is the weekend. I will get back to you as soon as I hear back from them.
Regards,
KritiMay 24, 2020 at 12:38 pm #4182
Kriti SharmaKeymasterHi Ankit,
We imported your Test quiz onto our staging website.
https://qsm-stg1.expresstech.dev/quiz/test-quiz/
It is working properly. QSM is able to detect the correct answer selected and the css classes for the answer provided is correct.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YmgJ4sKxcdApibCVWYKTlklriegXIqBU
Please update to latest QSM plugin which was released yesterday.
Please clear any cache plugin’s cache content and browser history after making the update.
Regards,
KritiNovember 21, 2025 at 4:59 pm #16342
alex arafatParticipantI ran into something similar with long quizzes, and it reminded me of planning my stay at drift away lodge costa rica — sometimes small glitches can disrupt the flow, but with patience, everything works out. For your issue, it might be related to caching, JavaScript conflicts, or internal limits on question data. Checking for plugin conflicts or server-side limits could help, especially with very long quizzes where saved changes sometimes don’t stick.
December 13, 2025 at 6:49 am #16791
alex arafatParticipantI’ve experienced a similar issue with quiz results, where the correct answer still shows up as incorrect. It’s really frustrating when you’ve spent time setting everything up, but it doesn’t reflect properly. Also, I’ve noticed some quizzes lose saved changes, especially when the quizzes are quite long. Could there be a system limit to the number of questions or pages, or might there be something else causing these problems? On a lighter note, it reminds me of how thorough things need to be when you’re working with Goldador puppies Colorado from Colorado’s Finest Kennels and Ranch. They take great care to ensure every dog is healthy and well-socialized, just like how we need to ensure everything in the system is thoroughly checked.
December 13, 2025 at 11:39 am #16797
alex arafatParticipantI’ve run into a similar issue with my own project. It reminds me of how comfortunion began as a family vision, evolving into something more meaningful over time. Just like Comfort Union grew from a simple idea to a trusted mission, these bugs seem to be evolving from small glitches to more significant issues in the system. If the user’s answers are showing incorrectly or saved changes aren’t sticking, it’s like the system’s foundation needs some refining to ensure everything functions smoothly, much like how Comfort Union’s mission aims to create lasting, reliable outcomes for Calgary families.
January 12, 2026 at 4:06 pm #17535
Set BetParticipantHola, después de un día largo quería desconectar y hacer algo entretenido sin salir de casa. Aproveché los bonos para nuevos jugadores en España y empecé a probar suerte en spingranny . Ai principio perdí algunos giros, pero al tomar riesgos calculados conseguí un buen premio. Me hizo pasar un rato divertido y relajante, justo lo que necesitaba para terminar la tarde con buena energía.
February 6, 2026 at 10:01 am #18396
Thomas kerryParticipantThis usually happens when answer IDs change after edits or when cached data doesn’t refresh properly. Re-saving the question, clearing plugin cache, and checking if you’re using custom grading logic often fixes it. I’ve seen similar mismatches pop up in beta-style environments where access or IDs are handled differently, which is why controlled testing matters. That idea is why I found this beta access setup interesting https://unlockbetaservers.com/. It highlights how structured access can reduce unexpected behavior during testing.
March 12, 2026 at 3:08 pm #19452
Ert NarterParticipantI’m not the kind of person who usually writes reviews. I consume content—products, services, experiences—without ever feeling the need to share my opinion with the world. But six months ago, I wrote a review that changed my life. Not because of what I said, but because of what happened after.
It started with my brother, Jake. He’s younger than me by four years, and we’ve always had a complicated relationship. He’s the free spirit, the risk-taker, the one who never met a bad idea he didn’t want to try. I’m the cautious one, the planner, the one who reads the fine print and checks the reviews before buying anything. We balance each other out, I guess, but that balance has often felt more like friction.
Last year, Jake got really into online casinos. He’d call me at all hours, excited about some win, trying to convince me to join him. I’d listen politely, then go back to my carefully ordered life, convinced that gambling was for people who didn’t understand probability. Then one day, Jake called with news that made my stomach drop. He’d lost a lot of money. More than he could afford. He was in trouble.
I flew out to see him that weekend. We talked for hours—really talked, for the first time in years. He told me about the loneliness, the desperation, the way the losses had piled up until he couldn’t see a way out. I listened, really listened, for the first time in years. And at the end of it, I made him a promise: I’d help him get out of debt, but only if he let me understand what had happened. Only if he showed me the sites he’d been using.
That’s how I ended up on vavada review pages, reading through dozens of testimonials from people who’d played there. I was looking for something—I didn’t know what—maybe proof that the site was predatory, maybe proof that Jake’s losses were the exception rather than the rule. What I found surprised me.
The reviews were mostly positive. Real-sounding people sharing real-sounding stories. Wins, losses, everything in between. The more I read, the more I realized that Jake’s problem wasn’t the site—it was his approach. He’d been chasing losses, betting more than he could afford, treating gambling like a solution instead of entertainment. The site itself seemed legitimate. Fair, even.
I decided to test it myself. Not with real money at first—I’m too cautious for that—but by creating an account and exploring. I went through the registration, looked at the games, read the terms and conditions. Everything checked out. So I deposited fifty dollars—an amount I could afford to lose—and started playing.
I chose blackjack, because I understood the rules. I played carefully, strategically, never betting more than a few dollars. The fifty dollars lasted a long time. I’d win a little, lose a little, and my balance would hover in the same range. It wasn’t exciting, but it was interesting. I started to understand the appeal.
Over the next few weeks, I played regularly. Not every night—I couldn’t afford that—but enough to get a feel for the experience. I’d log in, play for an hour, log out. I kept my bets small, my expectations smaller, and my balance grew slowly but steadily. Fifty became seventy, seventy became a hundred. I discovered that I had a talent for live dealer blackjack. There was something about the strategy, the decisions, the interaction with the dealer that engaged my brain in a way I hadn’t expected.
Then came the night that changed everything. It was a Thursday in October, about two months after Jake’s crisis. He was doing better—in therapy, on a payment plan, slowly rebuilding. I was feeling cautiously optimistic. That night, after a long week at work, I opened the casino, my balance sitting at around a hundred and fifty dollars, and loaded up a game I’d been playing a lot lately.
It was called “Gates of Olympus,” a Greek mythology-themed slot with big multipliers and dramatic music. I started spinning, not really paying attention, just letting the game do its thing. The first few spins were nothing. Small wins, small losses. I was about to log off when the screen started to shake.
The bonus round triggered, and suddenly everything changed. Free spins. Multipliers. And the wins just kept coming.
I watched, barely breathing, as my balance climbed. Two hundred. Three hundred. Five hundred. I sat up, my heart starting to pound. Eight hundred. One thousand. I gripped my phone so tight my hands started to shake. Fifteen hundred. Two thousand.
When it finally ended, I was staring at a number that didn’t seem real. $2,340. From a single bonus round. From a game I’d been playing to understand my brother’s world.
I just sat there, in my apartment, and let it sink in. Then I started to laugh. A loud, disbelieving laugh that echoed off the walls. The universe, for reasons I couldn’t explain, had just handed me a gift.
I cashed out immediately. Every single cent. Watched the withdrawal confirmation pop up on my screen. And then I just sat there, holding my phone, and thought about what I’d do with the money.
The answer was obvious. Jake’s debt. The money I’d promised to help with. I transferred it to him the next morning, told him it was from savings, from extra work, from anywhere but where it really came from. He cried on the phone, which made me cry, and we sat there sniffling and laughing at the same time.
That was six months ago. Jake’s debt is gone. He’s still in therapy, still working on himself, but he’s in a better place. We talk every week now, really talk, in a way we never did before. And every time we do, I think about that Thursday night. About the game, the bonus round, the impossible luck. About the vavada review pages that started it all.
I still play sometimes. Not as often as I used to, but when I need a reminder of what’s possible, I’ll log in and spin a few times. And every time I do, I think about Jake. About the bond we rebuilt. About the gift that came from nowhere and changed everything.
That’s the thing about reviews. They’re supposed to be about the thing you’re reviewing—the product, the service, the experience. But sometimes, they’re about something else entirely. Sometimes they’re about connection. Sometimes they’re about understanding. Sometimes they’re about finding your way back to someone you love.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.